“Pass to score TDs, run to kick field goals”…or not

With the current emphasis on the passing game in the NFL, the adage “throw to score TDs, run to kick field goals” has become popular with commentators.

Is it true?

To get an idea, I looked at the passing play percentage and points scored for every team in the league going back to 2003, giving me 320 data points.  Here is the chart, with passing play percentage on the X and points scored on the Y:

Screen Shot 2013-01-02 at 4.01.26 PM

See a relationship?

If you said no, you’d be correct.  The correlation value for the above data series is -.083, which means there is really no relationship.  Passing the ball more often does not appear to lead to more points scored.

Some of you (if not everyone) are probably thinking:  “Wait, teams change their play-calling when the are winning/losing, skewing the run/pass ratio.”  My answer: Of course they do, but that itself should not skew the above data to such a degree that there is NO relationship between passing percentage and points scored (if passing really did lead to more points scored.)  Teams that noticeably change their strategy can only do-so late in the game, limiting the number of plays they can run that will skew their overall averages.  Additionally, teams that are running the ball to kill the clock take as much time as possible, running as few plays as possible, again limiting the skew.  Overall, of all the plays run in the NFL every year, relatively few of them are run by teams focused on anything except scoring points.

Feel free to disagree, but if passing the ball more really did lead to more points scored (i.e. TDs instead of field goals), I’d expect to see at least a weak-moderate positive relationship despite any skew effects of teams killing the clock.

Conversely, we can also ask: “Do teams pass more when they are losing?” While the data can’t tell us definitively which is cause and which is effect (do losing teams throw more or does throwing lead to more points against?), it can show us if there is a relationship between the two. Here is the chart, this time with Points Allowed on the Y axis:

Screen Shot 2013-01-02 at 4.37.13 PM

A fairly clear positive relationship exists.  In fact, the correlation value of .46 confirms there is a moderate positive relationship between Passing Play Percentage and Points Allowed.

Let me note again that the data doesn’t prove “Losing teams throw more often”, but it does lend pretty strong support to that hypothesis.  However, given the data above, perhaps losing teams should consider running the ball more, since passing it doesn’t appear to give them a greater chance of catching up (scoring points.)

Obviously this doesn’t hold for end of game scenarios where the clock becomes a big factor (passing takes less time then running.)  However, it does suggest that teams that fall behind early shouldn’t alter their game plan until it is absolutely necessary (very late in the game), something Andy Reid repeatedly did over his career with the Eagles.


2 thoughts on ““Pass to score TDs, run to kick field goals”…or not

  1. First – like your stuff. You’re on my daily read list now.

    Second – I don’t want to overstate my case here, because I think you’re right (and the last few years of Air MorningReid has left a real sour taste in my mouth), but while there isn’t a strict statistical correlation in the data set, I think you can make a few cases based off the first chart. One, that passing less than 50% of the time is likely to land you south of 400 points scored for the season, and you’re very unlikely to break 500. Second, if you want to be an “elite” point scoring team, you need to pass greater than 55% of the time, but this also puts you at risk of being among the worst scoring offenses (less than 200 points/season). The real weird part of the data is in the 50-55% range; seems like the worst average result. So I would argue that passing % isn’t irrelevant, but the high variability means that other factors play at least as strong a role as passing % in determining scoring. And in turn, scoring is not the same as winning (obviously), and I’m guessing you’ll get to that issue in a later post.

  2. Pingback: Points Per Play; NFL Offensive Efficiency | Eagles Rewind

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s